Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.


These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to health.

safe distance from cell tower  (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in many possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away the tower is.

While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As  follow this link , they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Additionally to  safe distance from cell tower , ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.