If https://click4r.com/posts/g/8763605/is-there-any-harm-by-5g 've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create issues for users.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. what is safe distance from 5g tower could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.