If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.
Although this may sound like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. faraday hats have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. faraday hat is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
Click for more for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.